블로그 이미지
Visiting Professor Plastic Surgery Stanford School of Medicine / Assistant Professor Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Hallym University Hospital YaNoe

카테고리

분류 전체보기 (293)
Stanford (53)
Oral & Maxillofacial (54)
Implant (42)
News (31)
의료상식 (10)
Cases (19)
Private (61)
Total66,245
Today62
Yesterday61

달력

« » 2012.05
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    




1044 Oral implants with different thread designs. A histometrical evaluation
G.E. ROMANOS1, M. DAMOURAS2, A. VEIS3, F. SCHWARZ4, and N. PARISIS3, 1New York University, USA, 2Dental School Frankfurt, Germany, 3University of Thessaloniki, Greece, 4University of Düsseldorf, Germany

Primary stability of oral implants is an important criterion for the long-term success. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) % may determine the osseointegration based on light microscopical examination. Objectives: The aim of this study was to find out the BIC and bone volume (in %) at the coronal (BVc) and apical (BVa) of surrounding trabecular bone in different implant systems with various thread designs immediately after their insertion. Methods: 5 implants of each one of the following implant systems with comparable sizes (11.00/3.5mm, progressive threads-Ankylos(A), thread cylinder-Frialit-2(F) and condensation threads-XiVE(X); 13.00/3.5 mm diameter for Replace (R) Select tapered) were inserted in rip bone of freshly slaughtered cows. The implants were placed using the exact surgical protocol suggested by the manufacturer. Immediately after surgery, the implants with the surrounded bone tissues were examined histologically and histomorphometrically using a grinding technique (Donath and Breuner, 1982). Results: The histomorphometrical evaluation (Mann-Whitney test) presented significantly better results in the BIC (A/F, A/R, A/X), the BVa (F/A, X/A) and the BVc (X/A, X/R, X/F).

Implant                    BIC%                      BVc                                 BVa

Ankylos                           37.00 ± 13.08                 22.00 ± 5.45                        17.00 ± 4.84   (n=11)

Frialit-2                           19.00 ±   8.62                 26.00 ± 3.75                        23.00 ± 5.42   (n=11)

XiVE                               22.16 ±   3.70                 34.50 ± 6.20                        22.50 ± 4.73    (n=5)

Replace Select Tapered    24.40 ± 7.86                    22.80 ± 6.86                        18.22 ± 6.30   (n=10) 

Based on these data only the primary BIC% of the tested implant systems seems to be dependent on the thread design. Conclusions: We concluded that the special progressive and condensation macrodesigns present significantly higher primary stability than other implant thread geometries.

Seq #119 - Imaging and Histological Analysis
3:30 PM-4:45 PM, Thursday, March 22, 2007 Ernest N. Morial Convention Center Exhibit Hall I2-J

Back to the Implantology Research Program
Back to the IADR/AADR/CADR 85th General Session and Exhibition (March 21-24, 2007)



Posted by Harrison YaNoe